Impact of perioperative transfusions and sepsis on long-term oncologic outcomes after curative colon cancer resection. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database / Impacto de las trasfusiones y de las sepsis perioperatorias en los resultados oncológicos de largo plazo tras cirugía curativa de cáncer de colon. Análisis retrospectivo de una base prospectiva

Objective: Intra-abdominal septic complications (IASC) affect short-term outcomes after surgery for colon cancer. Blood transfusions have been associated with worse short-term results. The role of IASC and blood transfusions on long-term oncologic results is still debated. This study aims to assess the impact of these two variables on survival after curative colon cancer resection. Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent curative surgery for colon cancer at a university hospital, between 1993 and 2010. Cox regression was used to identify the role of IASC and transfusions (alone and combined) on local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results: Out of the 1686 patients analyzed, 1277 fit in the inclusion criteria. Colorectal surgeons performed the procedure in 82.2% of the patients. Blood transfusions were administered to 25.8% of the patients. Thirty-day complication and mortality rates were 34.5% and 6.1%. IASC occurred in 9.9%. The mean follow-up was 66 months. The 5-year rates of LR, DFS, and CSS were 7%, 79.8%, and 85.1%. The year of surgery and pT (Hazard ratio 9.35, 95% CI 1.23-70.9, for T4) and pN (Hazard ratio 2.57, 95% CI 1.39-4.72, for N2) stages were independent risk factors for LR. The same variables, bowel obstruction and surgeries performed by surgeons not specialized in colorectal surgery, were also associated with worse DFS and CSS. IASC and blood transfusions were not associated with LR, DFS, and CSS, whether alone or combined. Conclusions: IASC and transfusions were not associated with worse oncological outcomes after curative colon cancer surgery per se. Other factors were more important predictors of survival

Objetivos: Las complicaciones sépticas intra-abdominales(CSIA) empeoran los resultados a corto plazo después de cirugía por cáncer de colon. Las trasfusiones de sangre también han sido relacionadas con peores resultados a corto plazo. El impacto de la CSIA y de las transfusiones en los resultados oncológicos es todavía debatido. Objetivo del presente estudio fue valorar el impacto de estas dos variables en la supervivencia de pacientes intervenidos por cáncer de colon. Pacientes y métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de una base prospectiva de pacientes sometidos a cirugía curativa por cáncer de colon en un hospital universitario(1993-2010). Se utilizó regresión de Cox para valorar el efecto de CSIA y trasfusiones(aislados o en combinación) sobre recidiva local(RL), supervivencia libre de enfermedad(SLE) y supervivencia cáncer-especifica(SCE). Resultados: De los 1686 pacientes analizados, se incluyeron 1277. La cirugía fue realizada por cirujanos colorrectales en el 82,2% de los pacientes. El 25,8% recibió transfusiones. Las tasas de complicaciones y mortalidad a los 30 días fueron del 34,5% y 6,1%. La frecuencia de CSIA fue del 9,9%. El seguimiento mediano fue de 66 meses. Las tasas a los 5 años de RL,SLE y SCE fueron 7%, 79,8% y 85,1%. El año de tratamiento, los estadios pT(Cociente de riesgo 9,35,IC95% 1,23-70,9,en T4)y pN(Cociente de riesgo 2,57,IC95% 1,39-4,72,en N2)resultaron como factores de riesgo para RL. Las mismas variables, la obstrucción intestinal y la cirugía realizada por cirujanos no colorrectales se asociaron también a peor SLE y SCE. CSIA y trasfusiones no resultaron asociadas con RL, SLE y SCE, ni de forma aislada ni combinadas. Conclusiones: Las CSIA y trasfusiones no afectaron per se los resultados oncológicos de la cirugía de cáncer de colon. Otros factores resultaron más importantes predictores de supervivencia

Impact of perioperative transfusions and sepsis on long-term oncologic outcomes after curative colon cancer resection. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database.

OBJECTIVE: Intra-abdominal septic complications (IASC) affect short-term outcomes after surgery for colon cancer. Blood transfusions have been associated with worse short-term results. The role of IASC and blood transfusions on long-term oncologic results is still debated. This study aims to assess the impact of these two variables on survival after curative colon cancer resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent curative surgery for colon cancer at a university hospital, between 1993 and 2010. Cox regression was used to identify the role of IASC and transfusions (alone and combined) on local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: Out of the 1686 patients analyzed, 1277 fit in the inclusion criteria. Colorectal surgeons performed the procedure in 82.2% of the patients. Blood transfusions were administered to 25.8% of the patients. Thirty-day complication and mortality rates were 34.5% and 6.1%. IASC occurred in 9.9%. The mean follow-up was 66 months. The 5-year rates of LR, DFS, and CSS were 7%, 79.8%, and 85.1%. The year of surgery and pT (Hazard ratio 9.35, 95% CI 1.23-70.9, for T4) and pN (Hazard ratio 2.57, 95% CI 1.39-4.72, for N2) stages were independent risk factors for LR. The same variables, bowel obstruction and surgeries performed by surgeons not specialized in colorectal surgery, were also associated with worse DFS and CSS. IASC and blood transfusions were not associated with LR, DFS, and CSS, whether alone or combined. CONCLUSIONS: IASC and transfusions were not associated with worse oncological outcomes after curative colon cancer surgery per se. Other factors were more important predictors of survival.

Prognostic Impact of pT Stage and Peritoneal Invasion in Locally Advanced Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: TNM stage has been identified as an independent variable for local recurrence and survival after colon cancer resection. It is still unclear whether peritoneal invasion (pT4a) is a risk factor for adverse oncologic outcome or whether these patients have better results compared with contiguous organs infiltration (pT4b), independent from nodal status (pN). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze whether peritoneal invasion is an independent risk factor for worse oncologic outcome after curative colon cancer resection. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis with multivariate regression of a prospective database, according to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in a specialized colorectal unit of a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: A consecutive series of pT3-pT4a-pT4b patients with colon cancer who underwent curative surgery (1993-2010) were included, and patients with metastasis were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to assess independent risk factors for 5-year local recurrence, peritoneal carcinomatosis-like recurrence, disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: A total of 1010 patients were analyzed (79.3% pT3, 9.9% pT4a, and 10.8% pT4b). At diagnosis, 22.0% had obstructive symptoms, and 10.5% had bowel perforation. A total of 72.2% of the surgeries were elective, and in 15.6% en bloc resection of contiguous organs was performed. Median follow-up was 62 months (38-100 mo). For the whole group, 5-year actuarial rates were 8.8% for local recurrence, 2.5% for peritoneal carcinomatosis, 75.5% for disease-free survival, and 81.8% for cancer-specific survival. At multivariate analysis, pT4a stage was an independent risk factor for local recurrence (p = 0.002; HR = 3.1), peritoneal carcinomatosis (p = 0.02; HR = 4.9), worse disease-free survival (p = 0.002; HR = 1.9), and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.001; HR = 2.2). When considering only the 566 patients with ≥12 nodes identified, T stage was still associated with higher local recurrence (p = 0.04) and carcinomatosis rate (p = 0.04), as well as worse disease-free (p = 0.009) and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.014). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective, single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: pT4a stage is an independent risk factor for worse oncologic outcome after curative colon cancer resection compared with pT3 and pT4b stages. The current pT4a-pT4b classification should be reconsidered. Of note, even in pT4a patients, 5-year carcinomatosis rate does not exceed 6%. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A926.

Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery in the treatment of left colon cancer obstruction: Cost-benefit analysis and oncologic results. / Stents metálicos autoexpandibles como puente a la cirugía en el tratamiento del cáncer de colon izquierdo en oclusión. Análisis coste-beneficio y resultados oncológicos.

INTRODUCTION: The use of a self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery in acute malignant left colonic obstruction has been suggested as an alternative treatment to emergency surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare the morbi-mortality, cost-benefit and long-term oncological outcomes of both therapeutic options. METHODS: This is a prospective, comparative, controlled, non-randomized study (2005-2010) performed in a specialized unit. The study included 82 patients with left colon cancer obstruction treated by stent as a bridge to surgery (n=27) or emergency surgery (n=55) operated with local curative intention. The main outcome measures (postoperative morbi-mortaliy, cost-benefit, stoma rate and long-term oncological outcomes) were compared based on an "intention-to-treat" analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative data and tumor characteristics. The technically successful stenting rate was 88.9% (11.1% perforation during stent placement) and clinical success was 81.4%. No difference was observed in postoperative morbi-mortality rates. The primary anastomosis rate was higher in the bridge to surgery group compared to the emergency surgery group (77.8% vs. 56.4%; P=.05). The mean costs in the emergency surgery group resulted to be €1,391.9 more expensive per patient than in the bridge to surgery group. There was no significant statistical difference in oncological long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of self-expanding metalllic stents as a bridge to surgery is a safe option in the urgent treatment of obstructive left colon cancer, with similar short and long-term results compared to direct surgery, inferior mean costs and a higher rate of primary anastomosis.

Stents metálicos autoexpandibles como puente a la cirugía en el tratamiento del cáncer de colon izquierdo en oclusion. Analisis coste-beneficio y resultados oncológicos / Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery in the treatment of left colon cancer obstruction: Cost-benefit analysis and oncologic results

INTRODUCCIÓN: El uso de un stent metálico autoexpandible como puente a la cirugía del cáncer de colon izquierdo en oclusión se ha señalado como tratamiento alternativo a la cirugía de urgencia. El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar la morbimortalidad, el coste-beneficio y los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo de ambas opciones terapéuticas. MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo, comparativo, controlado y no aleatorizado (2005-2010) realizado en una unidad especializada. El estudio agrupó a 82 pacientes con cáncer de colon izquierdo en oclusión tratados mediante stent como puente a la cirugía (n = 27) o cirugía de urgencia (n = 55), intervenidos con intención curativa local. Las principales variables del estudio (morbimortalidad postoperatoria, coste-beneficio, tasa de estomas y resultados oncológicos a largo plazo) fueron comparados sobre la base de un análisis «con intención de tratar». RESULTADOS: No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los dos grupos en términos de datos preoperatorios y características tumorales. La tasa de éxito técnico en la colocación de la endoprótesis fue del 88,9% (con un 11,1% de perforaciones derivadas del stent), y el éxito clínico fue del 81,4%. No se observó diferencia alguna en cuanto a los índices de morbimortalidad postoperatoria. La tasa de anastomosis primaria fue superior en el grupo «stent como puente a la cirugía», en comparación al grupo «cirugía de urgencia» (77,8% frente a 56,4%; p = 0,05). Los costes medios por paciente en el grupo «cirugía de urgencia» resultaron ser más elevados (+ 1.391,9 Euros) que en el grupo «stent como puente a la cirugía». No se produjeron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cuanto a resultados oncológicos a largo plazo. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de stents metálicos autoexpandibles como puente a la cirugía constituye una opción segura para el tratamiento urgente del cáncer de colon izquierdo en oclusión, con resultados oncológicos similares a largo plazo en comparación a la cirugía de urgencia, con menor coste económico y una tasa superior de anastomosis primarias, evitando numerosos estomas

INTRODUCTION: The use of a self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery in acute malignant left colonic obstruction has been suggested as an alternative treatment to emergency surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare the morbi-mortality, cost-benefit and long-term oncological outcomes of both therapeutic options. METHODS: This is a prospective, comparative, controlled, non-randomized study (2005-2010) performed in a specialized unit. The study included 82 patients with left colon cancer obstruction treated by stent as a bridge to surgery (n=27) or emergency surgery (n=55) operated with local curative intention. The main outcome measures (postoperative morbi-mortaliy, cost-benefit, stoma rate and long-term oncological outcomes) were compared based on an "intention-to-treat" analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative data and tumor characteristics. The technically successful stenting rate was 88.9% (11.1% perforation during stent placement) and clinical success was 81.4%. No difference was observed in postoperative morbi-mortality rates. The primary anastomosis rate was higher in the bridge to surgery group compared to the emergency surgery group (77.8% vs. 56.4%; P=.05). The mean costs in the emergency surgery group resulted to be Euros 1,391.9 more expensive per patient than in the bridge to surgery group. There was no significant statistical difference in oncological long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of self-expanding metalllic stents as a bridge to surgery is a safe option in the urgent treatment of obstructive left colon cancer, with similar short and long-term results compared to direct surgery, inferior mean costs and a higher rate of primary anastomosis

Selective approach for upper rectal cancer treatment: total mesorectal excision and preoperative chemoradiation are seldom necessary.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of preoperative chemoradiation combined with total mesorectal excision has reduced local recurrence rates in rectal cancer. However, the use of both types of treatment in upper rectal cancer is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to assess oncological results after radical resection of upper rectal cancers compared with sigmoid, middle, and lower rectal cancers and to determine risk factors for local recurrence in upper rectal cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in a tertiary care referral hospital in Valencia, Spain. PATIENTS: Analysis included 1145 patients who underwent colorectal resection with primary curative intent for primary sigmoid (n = 450), rectosigmoid (n = 70), upper rectal (n = 178), middle rectal (n = 186), or lower rectal (n = 261) cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oncological results, including local recurrence, disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival, were compared between the different tumor locations. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for local recurrence in upper rectal cancer. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients (82.6%) with upper rectal tumors underwent partial mesorectal excision, and only 10 patients (5.6%) of that group received preoperative chemoradiation. The 5-year actuarial local recurrence, disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival rates for upper rectal tumors were 4.9%, 82.0%, and 91.6%. Local recurrence rates showed no differences when compared among all of the locations (p = 0.20), whereas disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival were shorter for lower rectal tumors (p = 0.006; p = 0.003). The only independent risk factor for local recurrence in upper rectal cancer was an involved circumferential resection margin at pathologic analysis (HR, 14.23 (95% CI, 2.75-73.71); p = 0.002). LIMITATIONS: This was a single-institution, retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Most upper rectal tumors can be treated with partial mesorectal excision without the systematic use of preoperative chemoradiation. Involvement of the mesorectal fascia was the only independent risk factor for local recurrence in these tumors.